People v. Hollis

Defendant, Garfield Hollis, was convicted by a jury of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, in violation of MCL 750.520b; MSA 28.788(2). After being sentenced to life imprisonment, he appeals as of right.

Defendant first alleges that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction on the charged offense. In People v Johnson,1 this Court set forth the standard to be followed where a claim is made that the evidence is insufficient upon which to find guilt:

"Would the evidence presented by the prosecution justify a reasonable person in concluding that all elements of the crime were…