Sessions v. Pintard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Bill in chancery [by Richard H. Sessions, Daniel H. Sessions, and Sandford C. Faulkner against John M. Pintard], for an injunction. determined before the Hon. DANIEL RINGO, District Judge, holding the circuit court. Absent the Hon. PETER V. DANIEL, Associate Justice of the supreme court.
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT.
This day came the complainants by Pike and Cummins, their solicitors, and the defendant by S. H. Hemp-stead, his solicitor, and by agreement the answer of said Pintard is to have the like *1090effect as if sworn to, and the complainants enter their general replication to the said answer in short on the record by consent. And, l>y consent of parties, this cause was submitted to the court, and came on for final hearing on bill and exhibits, answer and exhibits, and replication to the answer. On consideration whereof it is the opinion of the court, that the appropriation of the proceeds…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Campbell v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Weld v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Patterson v. WesterveltNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Young v. HosmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Stevens v. RoweNew York Supreme Court · 1846
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.