Boutelle v. White
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. The trial judge has no right to exclude from the courtroom, during the taking of testimony, a party to the case on trial. Saint Paul Fire &c. Ins. Co. v. Brunswick Grocery Co., 113 Ga. 786 (39 S. E. 483); Georgia Railroad &c. Co. v. Tice, 124 Ga. 459 (3) (52 S. E. 916, 4 Ann. Cas. 200); Knox v. Harrell, 26 Ga. App. 772 (107 S. E. 594). It is a matter entirely within the discretion of the trial judge as to whether lie will require that the testimony of a party to the case be taken before the talcing of the testimony of the party’s witnesses. Tift v. Jones, 52 Ga. 538 (4). If the judge could…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- O'Dowd v. NewnhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Tift v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Brunswick Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Giles v. VoilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Willingham v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Chrysler Corp. v. Wilson Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Ross v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.