Legal Opinion

Boutelle v. White

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 24, 1929No. 19393PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The trial judge has no right to exclude from the courtroom, during the taking of testimony, a party to the case on trial. Saint Paul Fire &c. Ins. Co. v. Brunswick Grocery Co., 113 Ga. 786 (39 S. E. 483); Georgia Railroad &c. Co. v. Tice, 124 Ga. 459 (3) (52 S. E. 916, 4 Ann. Cas. 200); Knox v. Harrell, 26 Ga. App. 772 (107 S. E. 594). It is a matter entirely within the discretion of the trial judge as to whether lie will require that the testimony of a party to the case be taken before the talcing of the testimony of the party’s witnesses. Tift v. Jones, 52 Ga. 538 (4). If the judge could…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. O'Dowd v. NewnhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Tift v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  4. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Brunswick Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Giles v. VoilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Willingham v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. Wilson Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Ross v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API