Legal Opinion

Hampton-Wildwood Corp. v. Fox Grocery Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided November 24, 1975No. GD75-22550Published

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, J.,

Presently before the court are preliminary objections filed by defendants, Fox Grocery Company, Harold Friedman, Inc. and Harold Friedman. All three defendants allege that, pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1509(c), the within action in equity should be certified to the law side of the court for the reason that plaintiff allegedly has a full, complete and adequate nonstatutory remedy at law. Also, defendant, Harold Friedman, has filed a preliminary objection alleging that the complaint should be dismissed as to him for improper service of process and, hence, lack of jurisdiction over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Atlantic Seaboard Natural Gas Co. v. WhittenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Conley-Irwin Corp. v. ReiterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Graham v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API