Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Sheppard v. Penn State Mutual Insurance
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1246 C.D. 1974Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Mencer:
I concur with the majority’s opinion except as to Part III, dealing with the revocation of the insurance agent’s license held by Evan C. Stineman. I would set aside the Department’s revocation of Mr. Stineman’s license upon the reasoning of Wallace v. Commomvealth of Pennsylvania, Insurance Department, 18 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 267, 334 A.2d 830 (1975).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wallace v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975