Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sheppard v. Penn State Mutual Insurance

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1246 C.D. 1974Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Mencer:

I concur with the majority’s opinion except as to Part III, dealing with the revocation of the insurance agent’s license held by Evan C. Stineman. I would set aside the Department’s revocation of Mr. Stineman’s license upon the reasoning of Wallace v. Commomvealth of Pennsylvania, Insurance Department, 18 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 267, 334 A.2d 830 (1975).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wallace v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975