Legal Opinion
The Boise Penrose
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 9, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
The suit was brought by the National Dry Dock & Repair Company, Inc., in rem, to recover for repairs, amounting to $2,392.96, made by libelant upon the tug Boise Penrose on June 14, 1919. The libel is in the usual form, alleging that the repairs were made at the request of the owner, master, or agent of the vessel.
The claimant, United Marine Contracting Corporation, appeared and filed its answer, alleging that it purchased the tug from the Meseck Towing & Transportation Company, Inc., on September 3, 1919, and received the usual United States custom house warranty bill…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. Central Argentine Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
- Norfolk Sand & Cement Co. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
- Coburn v. Factors & Traders Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1884
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merchants & Marine Bank v. The Fishing Vessel T. E. Welles, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Atlantic Coast Line R. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1943
- Phelps v. The Cecelia AnnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Rudy-Patrick Seed Co. v. Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki KaishaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932