In the Interest of T.S.M.

GARRETT, Judge.

Appellant filed an appeal of the trial court’s order entered in a dependency proceeding. We ordered that the appeal be treated as a petition for certiorari. However, upon further consideration we choose to treat the matter as a final appeal.

The appellant, acting pro se, claims a denial of due process in the dependency proceedings conducted by the trial court.

This case involved a lack of communication, not a lack of due process. HRS took temporary custody of T.S.M. and attempted to get appellant and his wife to agree to a plan for the child’s return. Appellant claims he did not…