Legal Opinion

City of Florence v. Calmet

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1908No. 5640PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Fremont County. Hon. M. 8. Bailey,• Judge. Action by Hippolite Calmet against tlie city of Florence. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

In the year 1885 the plaintiff located upon cer-. tain lands in the vicinity of Newland creek near the city of Florence. He constructed ditches for the purpose of taking water from Newland creek to irrigate these lands. In 1899 defendant constructed a system of water works and to supply such system took the water of Newland creek. In 1903 this action was brought by the appellee in the district court of Fremont county to recover a judgment for damages alleged to have been suffered by- him on account of the taking of the water by appellant, it being contended that the appellant diminished the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Teerpenning v. . the Corn Exchange Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Lothrop v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  4. Patrick v. CroweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Camp v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API