Pennsylvania Prison Society v. Cortés
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents an issue of our jurisdiction — standing—that was not raised, and therefore not considered, by the District Court. As the Supreme Court has held, “[t]he rules of standing, whether as aspects of the Art. Ill case-or-controversy requirement or as reflections of prudential considerations defining and limiting the role of the courts, are threshold determinants of the propriety of judicial intervention.” War th v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 517-18, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 45 L.Ed.2d 843 (1975).
“For that reason, every federal appellate court has a special…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Josh Finkelman v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Pressley v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.