Legal Opinion

Mannarino v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 18, 1964No. Docket No. 80937Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Samuel Mannarino and Rose Mannarino v. Commissioner.

Mannarino v. Commissioner

Docket No. 80937.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1964-246; 1964 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 94; 23 T.C.M. (CCH) 1476; T.C.M. (RIA) 64246; 21 Oil & Gas Rep. 476;

September 18, 1964

Vincent M. Casey, for the petitioners. Charles A. Boyce, for the respondent.

DAWSON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

DAWSON, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $5,069.38 in the income tax of petitioners and an addition to tax of $140.80 for failure to pay estimated income tax for the calendar year 1956. The issues for decision are (1)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Eckert v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Seaboard Commercial Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  5. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API