Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 31, 2009No. 36929-0-IIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

204 P.3d 257 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Matthew Warren BISHOP, Appellant.

No. 36929-0-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

March 31, 2009.

John A. Hays, Attorney at Law, Longview, WA, for Appellant.

Megan Hallin, Cowlitz Co. Pros. Atty. Office, Kelso, WA, for Respondent.

HOUGHTON, J.

¶ 1 Matthew Bishop appeals his conviction for unlawful methamphetamine possession. He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the methamphetamine evidence as fruit of a warrant the trial court issued without support of an oath or affirmation. He also argues that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MaddoxWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. MaddoxWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API