Legal Opinion

Struckmeyer v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1899No. Nos. 11,421—(208)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Martin county, Quinn, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

This case was before this court upon demurrer to the complaint, and reported in 64 Minn. 57, 65 N. W. 930. It has now been tried upon the merits, and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $225. The defendant moved for a new trial, and, this being denied by the court, he brings this appeal, alleging errors of law occurring at the trial and that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. Upon the last ground there appears to have been a sharp conflict in the evidence, and the weight thereof was clearly for the jury. We see no reason for disturbing the verdict, as it is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Struckmeyer v. LambSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Kahl v. Minnesota Wood Specialty, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API