Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Shorenstein Realty Services, L.P.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 16, 2011No. 07 C 3179PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.
Before the court is National Union’s bill of costs. AMICO has filed objections to the bill, and USF & G has joined in those objections. For the reasons that follow, I tax the amount of $13,759.65 against AMI-CO and USF & G, jointly and severally. I tax an additional amount, $15.80, solely against USF & G.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) provides that “costs other than attorneys’ fees should be allowed to the prevailing party.” 28 U.S.C. § 1920 specifies the costs that may be recoverable pursuant to Rule 54(d)(1): (1) the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Constance DEIMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CINCINNATI SUB-ZERO PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Lucille Smith, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Great American Restaurants, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Cheryle A. Collins and Heywood Fuller T. v. Kay GormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Richard and Sandra Finchum v. Ford Motor Company and Kia Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Jesse Anderson and Jestine Turnbough v. Roy GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bonds v. FizerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Levitin v. Northwest Community HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- US Fidelity & Guar. v. SHORENSTEIN REALTY SERVS.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011