Legal Opinion

Tuner v. Club Med, Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided November 19, 1985No. 5709Published

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, J.,

The issue before this court is whether Pennsylvania or French law should be applied to the substantive issues in this case involving the drowning of a Pennsylvania resi*497dent at a resort in Martinique, a department of France.

In Griffith v. United Airlines, Inc., Pennsylvania abandoned the traditional practice of mechanically applying the law of “the place of the wrong” in addressing confliet-of-laws issues and sought a more flexible approach. Griffith v. United Airlines, Inc., 416 Pa. 1, 21, 203 A.2d 796 (1964). While the Griffith court was clear in its rejection of the traditional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. CIPOLLA v. ShaposkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Levin by Levin v. Desert Palace, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Kabo v. Summa Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API