Legal Opinion

Mussel v. Tama County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Tama District Court. Action to recover for services and aid furnished to a pauper, as plaintiff claims. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

The amount in controversy being less than $100, we are required to determine questions which have been certified by the court.

oate<oí<3towncoñciuSveeon county. I. The plaintiff furnished aid to a poor person, as he claims, and upon the account presented to the board of supervisors for allowance was the following: “We, undersigned, trustees of Salt Creek township, Tama county, Iowa, hereby certify we have carefully examined the within bill, and that the several items thereof were necessary and proper, and were furnished by J. B. Mussel to the pauper therein named, at our request; that the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Case v. Davis CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Lacy v. Monona CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API