Legal Opinion

Berry v. Gramley

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 16, 1999No. 97 C 8623PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETTLEMAN, District Judge.

In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Wilder Kendric Berry claims that his privately retained trial counsel, Leo I. Fox, was constitutionally ineffective in representing petitioner at his 1992 trial on the charges of aggravated kidnaping and aggravated criminal sexual assault. After briefing the issue, this court held an evidentiary hearing (the “habeas hearing”) 1 at which petitioner, Fox and two other witnesses testified. Based on the record presented, this court is convinced that Fox’s representation of petitioner was incompetent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Anthony Hall v. Odie Washington, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Raygoza v. BohlerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  2. United States Ex Rel. Taylor v. BarnettDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API