Legal Opinion

Baer's Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1923No. Appeal, 90PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Appellant denies liability for the state mercantile tax imposed pursuant to the Act of May 2, 1899, P. L. 184. It is a revenue act imposing an annual tax of $3 on each wholesale vendor of goods, wares and merchandise, and “y2 mill additional on each dollar of the whole volume, gross, of business transacted annually,” ascertained pursuant to the provisions of the act. The case was tried below on agreed facts.

Appellant was a wholesale lumber dealer in Reading, Pa., where he resided and maintained his place of business. He dealt in (1) lumber shipped from other states into…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Sonneborn Brothers v. CuretonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Knisely v. CotterelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Commonwealth v. Thorne, Neal & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blauner's, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Mouledoux v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Commonwealth v. Harrisburg Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Beaver County Cooperative Association's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Commonwealth v. Wiloil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API