State v. Archuleta
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
State v. Tower, 2002-NMCA-109, ¶ 9, 133 N.M. 32, 59 P.3d 1264, holds that entry into a commercial business establishment contrary to a no trespass order constitutes an “unauthorized entry” into the business under our commercial burglary statute. The question presented in this case is whether Tower should be overruled in light of our Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Office of the Public Defender ex rel. Muqqddin, 2012-NMSC-029, 285 P.3d 622. The district court concluded that Tower is no longer viable in light of Muqqddin, and dismissed the indictment charging Defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SwickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Office of the Public Defender Ex Rel. MuqqddinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. FoulenfontNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. RileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016