Custodi v. Town of Amherst
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Martoche, J.P., and Smith, J. (dissenting).
We agree with Supreme Court that the doctrine of primary assumption of risk bars plaintiffs’ recovery. We therefore respectfully dissent and would affirm the order granting the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.
Plaintiff, who testified at her deposition that she was an experienced rollerblader whose skill level was “between intermediate and advanced,” was rollerblading in the street near defendants’ house. An ice cream truck blocked plaintiff’s path and, although plaintiff was aware that the sidewalk was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morgan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Benitez v. New York City Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Maddox v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Sorice v. Captree Homes, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.