Legal Opinion

In re Joseph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 26, 1999Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was suspended from practice for a period of one year by this Court (Matter of Joseph, 237 AD2d 727). He now applies for reinstatement.

We conclude that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order which suspended him and with the provisions of this Court’s rule governing the conduct of suspended attorneys (22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that he has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule regulating reinstatement (22 NYCRR 806.12) and that he possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law.

However, mindful of respondent’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API