Hill v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board. Employer was not served with a copy of the petition for review and asserts that, as a consequence, we lack jurisdiction. ORS 183.482(2) provides:
“Copies of the petition shall be served * * * upon the agency, and all other parties of record in the agency proceeding.”
Whether the service requirement of ORS 183.482(2) is jurisdictional has never been decided. We hold that it is mandatory, but not jurisdictional. ORS 183.482(1) sets forth the jurisdictional requirements for review of a contested case. Failure to meet a…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Rivas-Valles v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Southern Oregon Neurological Associates v. EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990