Legal Opinion
Einhorn v. Kaplan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 5, 1935No. 5165PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This case, one in bankruptcy, turns on its own particular facts. No precedent or novel principles are involved. The court below refused to make a turnover order on the bankrupt. After a study of the proofs and due consideration of all matters involved, we have reached the conclusion that in doing so the court committed no error. Therefore, its decree is affirmed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Tatcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- United States v. TatcherDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- United States v. PokrassDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940