Legal Opinion

Buxton v. Murch

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 21, 1995No. Record 941046PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

In this dispute between neighboring landowners, we consider whether an easement providing a right-of-way to the Rappahannock River was an express easement, whether the location of the easement changed with the consent of the parties, and whether use of the easement was restricted to non-waterfront property owners.

Joseph T. Buxton, III, and Mary Wakefield Buxton (the Buxtons) own Lots 20 and 21 of the Richardson subdivision in the Town of Urbanna. These lots are located between the Rappahannock River and Kent Street. Roger A. Murch and Ursula B. Murch (the Murches) own property on the south…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raney v. Four Thirty Seven Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Wagoner v. Jack's Creek Coal CorporationSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  3. Allen v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  4. McDougle v. McDougleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shooting Point, L.L.C. v. WescoatSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  2. Danville Historic Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of DanvilleDanville County Circuit Court · 2004
  3. Burak v. Appalachian Power Co.Virginia Circuit Court · 2002
  4. Garner v. Joseph 201362Supreme Court of Virginia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API