Legal Opinion · Dissent

Studley v. Studley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1986No. 50436Published

1DissentPatton, J.

Although I concur with the majority with respect to the second assignment of error, I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s finding that the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment.

The issue in this case is what insurance was the deceased required to maintain for his child pursuant to the terms of the divorce decree. The transcribed separation agreement which was incorporated into the divorce decree referred to only one policy — the Metropolitan Life policy. In contrast, the judgment, which is used to memorialize the separation agreement, incorporated the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Chester Township v. Geauga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hofer v. HoferOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API