Thomson v. Brown
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Klugh, J., Spartanburg, October, 1898. Two actions for injunction by Jessie M. Thomson against C. P. Brown, and E. A. Brown, administrator of J. J. Brown, and J. M. Nicholls, sheriff of Spartanburg County, and same plaintiff against the two first named defendants, and E. A. Crawford, sheriff of York County. The Circuit decree is as follows: 1 This cause came on for hearing at Spartanburg, in July, 1898, on exceptions to the master’s report.
Read the full summary
Before Klugh, J., Spartanburg, October, 1898. Two actions for injunction by Jessie M. Thomson against C. P. Brown, and E. A. Brown, administrator of J. J. Brown, and J. M. Nicholls, sheriff of Spartanburg County, and same plaintiff against the two first named defendants, and E. A. Crawford, sheriff of York County. The Circuit decree is as follows: 1 This cause came on for hearing at Spartanburg, in July, 1898, on exceptions to the master’s report. When the case was called, plaintiff’s attorney was absent, and the attorney for the defendant took an order requiring the case to be submitted on…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
5 The record in this case is presented in such shape that it is almost impossible to gather a correct understanding of the issues involved. For instance, it is stated in the record that “the pleadings and general scope of this cause appear in previous decisions of this Court.” The cases of In re Perry, 42 S. C., 183, and Moore v. Perry, 42 S. C., 369, show that the statements of the case for hearing on appeal to' this Court, should contain within itself all that is necessary to be considered by this Court, and that this Court cannot…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Durant v. ReamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927