Purvis v. Dempsey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 130, Oct. T., 1912, by defendant, from order of O. P. Butler Co., March T., 1912, No. 123, discharging rule to strike off judgment in case of Mary E. Purvis, et al., v. W. W. Dempsey. Rule to show cause why a judgment should not be stricken from the record.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 130, Oct. T., 1912, by defendant, from order of O. P. Butler Co., March T., 1912, No. 123, discharging rule to strike off judgment in case of Mary E. Purvis, et al., v. W. W. Dempsey. Rule to show cause why a judgment should not be stricken from the record. From the record it appeared that on February 7,1910, the plaintiffs executed a lease to the defendant of real estate in the Borough of Butler for the term of ten years for á total rent of twenty thousand dollars payable two thousand dollars per year in quarterly installments. The material portions of the lease were as follows:…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The order appealed from is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge of the Common Pleas discharging the rule to strike off the judgment.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Homart Development Co. v. SgrenciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. J. & A. Moeschlin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Grakelow v. KidderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Greco v. Woodlawn Furniture Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Stevenson v. DersamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.