Legal Opinion

Williams v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1939No. Appeals, 87 and 88PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiffs brought separate actions of trespass for slander which were consolidated for trial, as both grew out of the same set of circumstances. Verdicts in favor of each plaintiff in the sum of $500 were returned, but, on defendant’s motions, the court en banc entered judgments n. o. v. Upon appeals to the Superior Court, said judgments were reversed and the records remitted to the court below that judgments might be entered on the verdicts in favor of plaintiffs. Thereafter, on defendant’s petition, appeals to this Court were allowed.

Plaintiff Wells was employed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartman v. Hyman & LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Montgomery v. New Era Printing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Nagle v. NagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Beck v. StitzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  5. Lukehart v. ByerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Montgomery v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Binder v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Barry J. Quinones v. United States of America, and United States Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Its Agents and EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. American Future Systems, Inc. v. Better Business BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API