Legal Opinion

Watson v. National Surety Corp. of Chicago

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 17, 1991No. 90-123PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

This.appeal presents issues arising from a condition 1 in a fire insurance policy that permitted the insurer to question the insureds under oath. The policy was issued by defendant, The National Surety Corporation of Chicago, Illinois, a/k/a Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies (Fireman’s Fund), to plaintiffs-insureds, Robert H. Watson and Mable Ann Watson. The insurer denied plaintiffs’ claims on the basis of their refusal to be questioned under oath concerning the fire. Plaintiffs then commenced this declaratory judgment action in law to determine their rights under the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kisting v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1968
  2. Hoekstra v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  3. Farmers Insurance Group v. MerryweatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Allan R. Pervis, Jr. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. James West v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Nationwide Ins. Co. v. NilsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Thompson v. West Virginia Essential Property InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Thomson v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Spears v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API