Legal Opinion

State v. Blier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 7, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Chief Justice.

Rudolph Blier, the appellant, on December 8, 1975, was convicted by an Aroostook County Superior Court jury of the offense of operating a motor vehicle after suspension in violation of 29 M.R.S.A., § 787(7). He seasonably appealed to the Law Court on the sole issue that it was reversible error for the trial Justice to deny his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence. We deny the appeal.

In deciding whether a judgment of acquittal should be entered on a defendant’s motion pursuant to Rule 29(a), M.R.Crim.P., 1 the trial Justice should approach…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. O'ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. State v. MannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  3. State v. TraskSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  4. State v. WorreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GoyetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. HuffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. State v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. LovejoySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. State v. FlahertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API