Legal Opinion

Hammons v. National Surety Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1930No. Civil No. 2843PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

National Surety Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against A. T. Hammons as superintendent of banks and ex-officio receiver of the Stockmen’s State Bank, an insolvent banking corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to recover the sum of $3,062.67 with interest. The case was tried to the court on an agreed statement of facts and certain documentary evidence, and judgment was rendered for plaintiff; whereupon defendant brought the matter before us for review.

There are some seven assignments of error which present the legal question on the merits of whether or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  2. Garrett v. Reid-Cashion Land & Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Jarvis v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Corcoran v. KostrometinoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  5. Estate of MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Sorrells v. BergierArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Davidson v. StaggMontana Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API