Legal Opinion

Clemens v. Bruce

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1982No. Docket 58486PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs brought this action to obtain rescission of a land contract on grounds of misrepresentation and inability of defendant vendors to convey clear title. Defendants counterclaimed for foreclosure. In the course of a nonjury trial, plaintiffs’ claim for rescission for misrepresentation was dismissed. Plaintiffs’ claim for rescission for defendants’ inability to convey clear title was held in abeyance and defendants were ordered to cure any defect in their title. The court found for defendants on the counterclaim and ordered that a judgment of forfeiture would enter unless plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crampton v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. LowensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Auto Workers Flint Federal Credit Union v. KoglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cain v Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Czuprynski v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. UpshawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Cain v Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cain v Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API