Legal Opinion
Lutsky v. Schoenwetter
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 12, 2015No. 15-0648PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Herman Lutsky appeals, and Rochelle Schoenwetter cross-appeals, an order granting a temporary injunction on Scho-enwetter’s motion. We reverse and vacate the order.
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610 requires that a court’s injunctive order specify the reasons' for the entry of the injunction and contain clear, definite and unequivocal findings of fact to support the four elements of an injunction. Angelino v. Santa Barbara Enter., LLC, 2 So.3d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); City of Sunny Isles Beach v. Temple B’Nai Zion, Inc., 43 So.3d 904, 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). The order in this case does not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grove Isle Ass'n v. Grove Isle Associates, LLLPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Angelino v. Santa Barbara Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Chevaldina v. R.K./FL Management, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Biscayne Park, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- City of Sunny Isles Beach v. Temple B'Nai Zion, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
3Cited by2 opinions
- Credo LLC v. Speyside Investments Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Sammie Investments v. Strategica Capital AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018