Legal Opinion

Miller v. Bank of America, N.A. (USA)

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 2009No. C057896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

California has a pair of “holiday statutes” that essentially state that whenever a legal or contractual act is required to be performed on a holiday, the act may be performed on the next business day without any adverse consequence. (Civ. Code, §§ 9, 11.) The question in this appeal is whether these state holiday statutes apply to a national bank’s credit card payment due dates. They do not. This is because these state laws are preempted by a federal law stating that a national bank may make non-real-estate loans without regard to state law limitations concerning the terms of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. CHASE BANK USA, NADistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  2. Agustin v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
  3. Powell v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
  4. Davis v. Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  5. Parks v. MBNA AMERICA BANK, NACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API