Legal Opinion
ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 12, 2023No. 3:21-cv-01305Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 IMPRIMISRX, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. 13 (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF 14 OSRX, INC.; OCULAR SCIENCE, INC., No. 94); AND 15 Defendants. (2) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 16 PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON 17 THE PLEADINGS (ECF No. 96) 18 19 20 21 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 94) and Defendants’ 22 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 96). Having considered the parties’ 23 filings, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Skye Astiana v. the Hain Celestial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jackson v. Laureate, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1999
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.