Fausto v. Credigy Services Corp.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

RICHARD SEEBORG, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Manuel and Luz Fausto move for a protective order under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to delay producing recorded telephone conversations until they complete numerous depositions. Defendants Credigy Services Corporation, Credigy Receivables Inc., and Credigy Solutions Inc. (collectively “Credigy”) oppose the motion. This matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7 — 1(b). Because the Faustos have not…