Legal Opinion

Scott v. Blakely

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 27, 1913Published

On error to the Somerset Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

This was an action of dower. The only question in controversy was as to whether or not the plaintiff, Mrs. Scott, was married to a man named Ruth Goshen, who died seized of the land described in the declaration. The error assigned and argued was that the jury disregarded what the plaintiff’s counsel contends was the uncontradicted testimony as to the marriage. There was testimony tending to show a lawful marriage between the parties named; but, there was also testimony to the effect that they never were married. The jury found for the defendant, and, there being testimony to support that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayor of East Orange v. RichardsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Dilks v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API