Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Carlinville National Bank

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1900PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Macoupin county; the Hon. O. P. Thompson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Boggs

The appellant, having procured a certificate of importance, has prosecuted this appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court for the Third District affirmin g a judgment in the sum of $300, entered against him by the circuit court of Macoupin county, in an action of assumpsit brought by the appellee bank. The cause was heard in said circuit court before the court without the intervention of a jury.

It is urged the court entertained and applied erroneous views of the law applicable to the facts of the case. The facts necessary to be known in order the correctness of the ruling of the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Drovers' National Bank v. Anglo-American Packing & Provision Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ætna Insurance v. Alton City BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pinkney v. Kanawha Valley BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Winchester Milling Co. v. Bank of WinchesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Spokane Valley State Bank v. LutesWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Sheridan Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. First National Bank v. Bank of WhittierIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API