Thibaudeau v. Uglum
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Sheehy
I concur in the remand of this cause for a new trial for the failure of respondent to make adequate discovery. I dissent to the further conclusion of the majority that plaintiff is not entitled to a directed verdict on liability. In my opinion, the defendant in this intersection-collision case is negligent as a matter of law, and the plaintiff is not guilty of any contributory or comparative negligence as a matter of law.
My dissent is based on two grounds: (1) the right of way statute gave the plaintiff an undisputed right to proceed and placed an undisputable burden upon the disfavored…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- DeVerniero v. EbyMontana Supreme Court · 1972
- Massengale v. SvangrenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Jessen v. O'DANIELMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- Fester v. GeorgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.