Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Thibaudeau v. Uglum

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1982No. 81-553Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Sheehy

I concur in the remand of this cause for a new trial for the failure of respondent to make adequate discovery. I dissent to the further conclusion of the majority that plaintiff is not entitled to a directed verdict on liability. In my opinion, the defendant in this intersection-collision case is negligent as a matter of law, and the plaintiff is not guilty of any contributory or comparative negligence as a matter of law.

My dissent is based on two grounds: (1) the right of way statute gave the plaintiff an undisputed right to proceed and placed an undisputable burden upon the disfavored…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. DeVerniero v. EbyMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Massengale v. SvangrenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Jessen v. O'DANIELMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Fester v. GeorgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API