Legal Opinion

Seigel v. Neary

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1902PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by the tenant from a final order of dispossesion made in summary proceedings in the Municipal Court, Ninth District, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

This is a summary proceeding brought by the landlord against the tenant to recover possession of certain demised premises for nonpayment of rent for the month of February, 1902.

The facts in this case were conceded upon the trial and are embodied in the opinion of the learned trial judge from which we quote as follows: “ It is conceded that the only lease existing between the parties hereto is that dated the 7th day of February, 1899, by which the landlord leased the entire liquor store and cellar and approaches thereto of the premises situated on the southeast corner of 129th street and Park…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Boreel v. . LawtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Tallman v. . MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Christopher v. . AustinNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Lewis v. PaynNew York Supreme Court · 1830

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. PaternoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  2. 487 Elmwood, Inc. v. HassettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. In Re Embers 86th Street, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Bijan Designer for Men, Inc. v. St. Regis Sheraton Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Matlack v. KlineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API