Legal Opinion
B. F. Gladding & Co., Inc. v. Scientific Anglers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 14, 1957No. 12958_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALBERT LEE STEPHENS,
Circuit Judge.
Appellant B. F. Gladding & Co., Inc., argues in this petition that under applicable New York law, we are incorrect in holding in our earlier opinion 1 that appellee Scientific Anglers, Inc. is entitled to use those trade secrets that constitute unpatentable contributions to the “Aerofloat” fishing line. Gladding complains that Scientific has devised an apparatus for making tapered fishing lines which does not infringe the claims of the Variable Die Application and proposes to continue to make and sell its “Air Cel” lines, using this alleged non-infringing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- B. F. Gladding & Co., Inc. v. Scientific Anglers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Cahill v. ReganNew York Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kurt H. Volk, Inc. v. Foundation for Christian LivingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Brown v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1977
- Scientific Anglers, Inc. v. B. F. Gladding & Co., Inc., ApelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958