Johnson v. Allen
Supreme Court of Georgia
In Equity. In Bibb Superior Court. Motion to Dissolve Injunction. Decided by Judge Cole. At Chambers. October, 1866. In September, 1866, Johnson, the plaintiff in error, filed his bill against Allen, alleging that Allen was guardian of the complainant’s wife, and, as such, largely indebted to the complainant in right of his wife; that the parties submitted the matter to arbitrators, who, in August, 1866, awarded to the complainant $3.547.53; that complainant was only…
Read the full summary
In Equity. In Bibb Superior Court. Motion to Dissolve Injunction. Decided by Judge Cole. At Chambers. October, 1866. In September, 1866, Johnson, the plaintiff in error, filed his bill against Allen, alleging that Allen was guardian of the complainant’s wife, and, as such, largely indebted to the complainant in right of his wife; that the parties submitted the matter to arbitrators, who, in August, 1866, awarded to the complainant $3.547.53; that complainant was only awaiting the sitting of the Superior Court to have the award entered and made the judgment of said Court; that the securities…
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, because there is no such abuse of the discretion of the Court below as to require this Court to interfere. ■ The continuing or dissolving an injunction, on the coming in of the answer, is for the *254sound discretion of the Court below, and this Court will not control this exercise of this discretion, except in a case of manifest abuse.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Fuson v. Connecticut General Life Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Stibbs v. Agner & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884