Invista North America S.Á.R.L. v. M & G USA Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs INVISTA North America S.a.r.l. (“Invista”) and Auriga Polymers Inc.1 (“Auriga”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) sued M & G USA Corporation and M & G Polymers USA, LLC (collectively, “defendants”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,919,159 (“the 159 patent), 7,943,216 (“the ’216 patent”), and 7,879,930 (“the ’930 patent”) (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”). (D.I. 1; D.I. 7) Defendants asserted counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the patents-in-suit. (D.I.42)
In a memorandum…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. v. GameStop CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Western Plastics, Inc. v. DuBose Strapping, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020