Legal Opinion

State v. Bolden

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 3, 2012No. SC 92175PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

During Emily Bolden’s (“Defendant”) trial for assault and armed criminal action she and the State jointly proffered a defense-of-others instruction to the trial court that was submitted to the jury. She now claims that the submission of the erroneous instruction to the jury was plain error and seeks reversal of her conviction. This Court affirms the conviction in that there is no sua sponte duty for the trial court to correct the defendant’s faulty proffered instructions.

Facts

Defendant and her brother arrived at Fannie Powell’s (“Victim”) front door looking for two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. State v. MayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  3. State v. WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. State v. LeisureSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. State v. BeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. State v. ShockleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. State v. BrunerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  4. State v. MangumMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Wilson v. P.B. Patel, M.D., P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API