Bishop v. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff had judgment in an action to quiet title to eleven quartz mining claims, known as “Beryl Mining Claims”, all located in the Red Rock mining district in the county of Kern, state of California. From this judgment the Hayward Lumber & Investment Company, a corporation, appeals.
The court found that the plaintiff was the owner of all of said mining claims, and entered judgment to the effect that her title thereto be quieted, and especially as against any claims of the Hayward Lumber & Investment Company.
At the trial of the action the Hayward Lumber & Investment Company relied upon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fernandez v. BurlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Penrose v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by7 opinions
- Borello v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Reynolds v. LermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Cain v. WhistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Pride of Mojave Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.