Ishmael v. State

Larry Ishmael challenges his conviction for three counts of armed robbery raising three issues. Because no reversible error has been demonstrated, we affirm.

Ishmael first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence seized from the residence at which he was staying at the time of his arrest. Ishmael jointly occupied a single-family residence with Beatrice Allen and her sons, and, after Ishmael’s arrest, police obtained Allen’s verbal and written consent to conduct a search of the residence. We find no basis to disturb the trial court’s finding that the…