Legal Opinion
United States v. Wapnick
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 27, 1963No. 242, Docket 27537PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The evidence here was quite sufficient and the case was fairly tried and properly presented to the jury. Hence we find no reversible error. Defendant Wapnick’s contention of double jeopardy is prima facie untenable in the light of United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377, 43 S.Ct. 141, 67 L.Ed. 314, and Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 79 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- State v. MoellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Harold Wapnick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Klein v. MurtaghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Harold Wapnick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.