Blaikie v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.
This appeal is from the judgment and two subsequent orders denying relief in the nature of mandamus, in a civil action brought by James F. Blaikie, Jr. (Blaikie). The civil action is based on an attempt to enforce an alleged plea bargain made prior to Blaikie’s conviction of murder in the first degree, affirmed today in Commonwealth v. Blaikie, ante 601 (1978). The specific issues for determination are whether the judge below erred (1) by not ordering the district attorney for the Norfolk district to allow Blaikie to plead guilty to murder in the second degree and (2) by denying the motion…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Anthony Correale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Richard J. FronteroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MarkhamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. SouzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.