Hammond Savings & Trust Co. v. Boney
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Porter Superior Court; Harry B. Tuthill, Judge. Action between Mathias Boney and the Hammond Savings and Trust Company. From a judgment for the former, the latter appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, P. J.
It is conceded by appellant that the only questions presented on this appeal are that the decision and finding of the court are not sustained by sufficient evidence, and are contrary to law. There is no great conflict in the evidence. The radical difference between the parties is respecting its legal effect. The facts are substantially as follows: On January 1, 1907, and at all other times mentioned in the record, Anton H. Tapper was the owner of a certain business block in the city of Hammond, consisting of three stories and a basement; on said day, Tapper, by an instrument in writing,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Detroit Daily Post Co. v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Fults v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Bell v. LongworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Judy v. CitizenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Moyer v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buchanan v. CritesUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- Calef v. JessweinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931