Legal Opinion

Cleghorn v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Estates. Title. Trusts. Before Judge Maddox. Floyd superior court. March adjourned term, 1889. On September, 1857, Chas.

Read the full summary

Estates. Title. Trusts. Before Judge Maddox. Floyd superior court. March adjourned term, 1889. On September, 1857, Chas. O. Force and Mary Smith (widow of Nathaniel Smith), in consideration of a marriage to be solemnized between them (which was solemnized on the same day), executed a deed of settlement with T. J. Word, trustee, whereby it was agreed that all the property of Mrs. Smith, embracing her interest in the estate of Nathaniel Smith (the property in dispute in this case being a part of it), should remain her separate property and estate, not subject to the control, debts or…

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

The only question insisted upon before us for a reversal of the judgment of the court below, was the construction of the marriage settlement entered into between Mary Smith and Charles O. Force, in 1857. The trial judge held that under that settlement Mrs. Smith (subsequently Mrs. Force) had only a life estate in the property, and that when she and her trustee sold the property to Scott, they sold only a life estate, it being admitted that Mrs. Force died before her husband, Charles O. Force. This holding the plaintiffs in error contend was erroneous. We do not think so, and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keener v. AddisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Bentley v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API