Legal Opinion

Porter v. Sprague

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 15, 1930Published

1Per curiam

This case is here on writ of error to a judgment in favor of Frank E. Sprague against E. E. Porter and John Porter as co-partners.

Of the numerous assignment of error the fortieth is well taken for the following reason. The plaintiff may recover only upon the case made by his declaration. When the declaration states a .cause of action and the parties go to trial upon appropriate pleas and the evidence supports the case as made by the declaration the plaintiff is entitled to recover. If the evidence does not support the declaration but does show the existence of a meritorious cause of action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Camp v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  2. Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ingram-Dekle Lumber Co. v. GeigerSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  4. Parrish v. Pensacola & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  5. Stearns & Culver Lumber Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API